"The letter I sent requesting protection against injustice that was committed in Ordizia"
February 24
Here, I attached the letter I sent in early November asking for protection and I have not received a reply four months later. Reading it will understand much of what I have been explaining and if you have questions and I will try to answer them.
For the attention of the Coordinator of Ezker Batua of Euskadi, the coordinator of the President and the Secretary of Organization of Ezker Batua of Euskadi and in his case to the Presidency of Ezker Batua.
Carlos Gonzalez Astiz, Ezker Affiliate Batua and No. 5 by candidate coalition-Berdeak Ezker Batua-Aralar in Ordizia.
In Ordizia to November 2, 2009.
I am writing to address Ezker Batua in Euskadi to the apparent helplessness I feel at what I consider a blatant manipulation of the smallest democratic and legal principles by some leaders of the organization in Gipuzkoa.
I think they know, and if it does not surprise me even more, because it means they have to inform even biased information to management, Ordizia's candidacy in the last elections and the results themselves have many particulars even before the meeting thereof.
Starting for the assembly of Ezker Ordizia Batua defined a list with respect to positions that we corresponded Antxon Karmelo Karrera and manipulated to carry the record. A Ezker Batua he was entitled to cover by 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 th, 11 th and 13 th candidate. The assembly approved Batua Ezker people which could meet these posts were in this order: Maialen Calparsoro, Carlos Gonzalez, Leontxi Uranga, Marisol Viana, Julen Carrasco, Manolo Sanchez and Txisto (Silvestre Calparsoro).
For art-birloque birlí in the registry is changed the third to the fifth and finally Leontxi I was going third and fifth.
Then came the big surprise, because nobody, not even the most optimistic thought we were going to get three councilors in Ordizia. It is obvious that the outlawing of Batasuna's bid was the most voted (null) facilitated this result. Then there were two problems, Leontxi only committed to go fill and it was not clear to enter as a councilor and ETA announced on returning to arms. Prior to this announcement, the assembly of the candidacy of Ordizia, had agreed not to take the council, while the apparent continue peace process for two reasons, first to contribute actively to this process and second as a militant anti-party law. Aralar announcement recognized the right of Ezker Batua to take the third council, but the use of the right involved the breakup of the coalition. In addition, mix an incident in Irun, also take off your to put myself (played by Millán) did temblequear things Ordizia, because in our village, if Leontxi (3 rd) did not occupy the council, Aralar had the bull by the handle.
For one thing and another, later (two years ago) including the opposition manifested Maialen cogiese Calparsoro to be the third council because he considered politically incorrect, which in essence share, not the council took third. In these Julen Carrasco appeared a few months earlier had announced with fanfare that he was retiring from the "front line" policy to make way for "younger" and announces apropos of nothing - without discussing it with anyone, much less collectively - for all the people - including councilors say it to other forces and the mayor himself - who will take the third council because, he says, is felt in the "moral obligation" to take it against ETA. It is to be discussed collectively indicate Ordizia is to bring the application because there is nothing more organically, much as some want to argue, for there is no grassroots organization.
Well, water does not move past the mill, but has and that's it.
The question I ask the intervention of the address is because you are jumping the priority in the application of Ordizia. The 5th is ahead of 9 and has been a trick to try to change that order and replace the 5 th to 3 ° and 9 ° at 1 °. It also has made the whole process ocultándoseme, having to learn through co-Aralar, a few days before being submitted for approval by the City Council Who my name has appeared in the replacement of the 3 rd but I know nothing about central election to the board in early October?
Using subterfuge to occupy the council had not been busy, handling change arises because even the order of the factors. The councilor, candidate 1, resigned in July, the July 16, just a day before going to Mexico to live.
I know that have changed the dates indicated to accompany the trick, and that is illegal, criminal liability can arise for people presenting that document to manipulate interest by the delegation that they had asked the councilor. It is true that Maialen Calparsoro resign in October, and you know, the Secretary, the Mayor and Council of Ordizia and that it was what made sense that the full council to defer the receipt of the communication of substitution by EB's resignation.
The issue is whether or not this what the people of Ordizia know. If you must know that there are leaders of Guipúzcoa EB playing with democracy in Ordizia. Who cheat with lists. That the people of the Coordinator General of EB these things happen.
The problem is if I ampararme challenge the legality and the process of substitution and occupation of councilors by EB. It is very easy to prove, but everything is very easy to explain. Much easier than one thinks, but especially dire consequences for EB inter alia for the delay in dealing with municipal and by the shameful spectacle we give to these traps.
All this is easy to fix if you will. EB routes a document to the Central Electoral Board requesting the correction of an "error" administrative amending the order of priority, indicating that 5 ° replaces 1 and address the occupation of the third council as not view this appropriate, but beg to be heard to ordiziarras, not just one.
It is also very easy to complicate it and obviously the lack of support by the direction of EB Euskadi I will seek relief in state management of UI, in the Central Electoral Board, in the municipal institutions and society itself ordiziarra.
From the full City, on October 22, I've been waiting for an official call that I have not received EB. I have not processed anything, even if legally I have advised all possible hypotheses. I have received from a board member's suggestion to make this letter so I am.
So, I need an immediate response and clarification, because there are times that I have to play in the scope of the challenge to meet on November 5.
Waiting democratic treated await your news.
My phone and my email is xxxxxxxxxx carlosastiz@gmail.com .
Carlos Gonzalez Astiz.
